Posts

Functional Outcome following Capitellum Excision in Isolated Capitellum Fracture: A Case Series

Vol 05 Issue 1 | January 2024 | page: 15-17 | Saurav Narayan Nanda, Saswat Samant, Debashish Mishra, Sayashi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/ojot.2024.v05i01.051

Received 02/07/2023; Reviewed 04/08/2023; Accepted 04/10/2023; Published 10/01/2024


Authors: Saurav Narayan Nanda [1], Saswat Samant [1], Debashish Mishra [1], Sayashi [1]

[1] Department of Orthopaedics, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Address of Correspondence

Dr Sayashi

Department of Orthopaedics, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Email: sayashi.96@gmail.com


Abstract


Background: Capitellum fractures are rare, and outcomes of fragment excision are reported by very few studies. The purpose of this study was to determine the range of motion and clinical outcomes for patients treated with capitellum excision.

Methods: Five patients with isolated capitellum fractures who underwent capitellum excision were retrospectively followed up for functional outcomes. The mechanism of injury, complications, type of fracture, and postoperative outcomes were assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score and Oxford Elbow Score. Final elbow range of motion (ROM) and elbow instability were also evaluated.

Results: The clinical follow-up was 12 months. The final examination demonstrated an average elbow range of motion from 8.3 degrees to 123.3 degrees flexion. Patients had full forearm rotation, and there was no clinical evidence of elbow instability. The DASH score and Oxford Elbow Score had improved for the patients at the final follow-up.

Conclusion: Capitellum excision can provide good functional outcomes in cases where open reduction and internal fixation cannot offer a satisfactory fixation and postoperative functional range of motion.

Keywords: Capitellum fractures, Excision, Range of motion, Clinical outcomes


References


  1. Bryan RS, Morrey BF. Fractures of the distal humerus. In: Morrey BF, ed. The elbow and its disorders. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1985: 325.
  2. Mighell MA, Harkins D, Klein D, et al. Technique for internal fixation of capitellum and lateral trochlea fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2006; 20(10): 699-704
  3. Alvarez E, Patel MR, Nimberg G, et al. Fracture of the capitulum humeri. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975; 57(8): 1093-1096
  4. Hahn NF. Fall von einer besonderes varietat der frakturen des ellenbogens. Z Wund Geburt. 1853; 6: 185.
  5. Dushuttle RP, Coyle MP, Zawadsky JP, et al. Fractures of the capitellum. J Trauma. 1985; 25(4): 317-321.
  6. Collert S. Surgical management of fracture of the captulum humeri. Acta Orthop Scand. 1977; 48(6): 603-606.
  7. Cottalorda J, Bourelle S. The often-missed Kocher-Lorenz elbow fracture. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009; 95(7): 547-550
  8. McKee MD, Jupiter JB. A contemporary approach to the management of complex fractures of the distal humerus and their sequelae. Hand Clin. 1994; 10(3): 479-494.
  9. McKee MD, Jupiter JB, Bamberger HB. Coronal shear fractures of the distal end of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996; 78(1): 49-54.
  10. Ruchelsman DE, Tejwani NC, Kwon YW, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of capitellar fractures with headless screws. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91(Suppl 2 Pt 1): 38-49.
  11. Poynton AR, Kelly IP, O’Rourke SK. Fractures of the capitellum—a comparison of two fixation methods. Injury. 1998; 29(5): 341-343.

How to Cite this Article: Nanda SN, Samant S, Mishra D, Sayashi | Functional Outcome following Capitellum Excision in Isolated Capitellum Fracture: A Case Series | The Odisha Journal of Orthopaedics and Trauma | January 2024; 05;01: 15-17 | https://doi.org/10.13107/ojot.2024.v05i01.051

(Article Text HTML)      (Download Full Text PDF)


Outcome of Differential period of immobilization (4 weeks Vs 6 weeks ) of Colles’ Type Fractures of the Distal Radius in Geriatric population: A prospective study

Vol 01 | January 2020 | page: 11-16 | Nirmal Chandra Mohapatra, Ramesh Chandra Maharaj, Jugaratna Khatua, Debi Prasad Nanda

DOI- 10.13107/ojot.2020.v41i01.005


Authors: Nirmal Chandra Mahapatra [1], Ramesh Chandra Maharaj [1], Jugaratna Khatua [1], Debi Prasad Nanda [1]

[1] Dept Of Orthopedics, SCB Medical College & Hospitals, Cuttack, Odisha India.

Address of Correspondence

Dr. Debi Prasad Nanda,
SCB Medical College & Hospitals, Cuttack, Odisha India
E-mail: drdebiortho@gmail.com


Abstract

Background: Perkin-Colles’ fracture however may leave behind a deformed wrist.
Aim: To evaluate how the period of immobilization in conservative treatment of extra-articular Colle’s type fractures of the distal radius affects functional outcome.
Objective: One group was immobilized for 4 week another group for 6 weeks.
Null Hypothesis: There is no difference between two groups in terms of functional outcome.
Methods: This prospective study included 70 patients and was carried in S.C.B. Medical College in Department of Orthopedics from 2017-19.One group was immobilized for 4 week another group for 6 weeks. Standard radiographs were made of both wrists in two directions after the fracture, then of the injured side on day 11 following repositioning, and at 3month and 6 month. Anatomical results were assessed by evaluating the dorsal angulation, loss of radial inclination, and loss of radial length. Functional results were assessed by the evaluation of pain, range of active motion, grip strength, and appearance of the wrist joint.
Results: 1-No Statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of functional outcome in 6 months 2- Statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of functional outcome in 3 months.
Conclusion: In long term follow up there is no difference in functional outcome with respect to period of immobilization rather it is more related to the radiological (anatomical) outcome.
Keywords: Casts, Conservative, Mayo score, Colles’ fracture, hand strength, prospective studies, radiography, range of motion, articular; treatment failure.


References

1-Ark J, Jupiter JB. The rationale for precise management of distal radius fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 1993;24:205-10.
2-Jupiter JB. Fractures of the distal end of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991;73:461-9.
3-Alfram PA, Bauer GC. Epidemiology of fractures of the forearm: a biomechanical investigation of bone strength. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1962;44:105-14.
4-Hesp R, Klenerman L, Page L. Decreased radial bone mass in Colles’ fracture. Acta Orthop Scand 1984;55:573-5.
5-Cassebaum WH. Colles’ fracture: a study of end results. JAMA 1950;143:963-5.
6-Golden GN. Treatment and prognosis of Colles’ fracture. Lancet 1963;1:511-5.
7-Bacorn RW, KurtkZeJF. Colles’ fracture : a study of two thousand cases from the New York State Workman’s Compensation Board. IBone Joint Surg (Am] 1953;35-A:643-58.
8-Gartland JJ Jr, Werley CW Evaluation of healed Colles’ fractures. I Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1951 ;33-A:895-907.
9-Golden GN. Treatment and prognosis of Colles’ fracture. Lancet 1963;i:51 1-5.
10-Pool C. Colles’ fracture: a prospective study of treatment. I Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1973;55-B:540-4.
11-Sarmiento A, Pratt GW, Berry NC, Sinclair WF. Colles’ fractures: functional bracing in supination. I Bone Join: Surg [Am] 1975;57-A :311-7.
12-van der Linden W, Erlcson R. Colles’ fracture : how should its displacement be measured and how should it be immobilized? I Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1981 ;63-A :1285-8.
13-Coosiey WP Ill, Dobyns JH, LInscbeld RL Complications of Colles’ fractures. I Bone Joint Surg (Am] l980;62-A :613-9.
14-Lidstrom A. Fractures of the distal end of the radius: a clinical and statistical study of end results. Ada Orthop ıcand 1959; Suppl 41.
15-Muller ME, Allgower M, Schneider R, Willenegger H. Manual of internalfixation: techniques recommendedby the AO Group. 2nd ed. Berlin etc : Springer-Verlag, 1979.
16-Salter RB, Slmnioiids DF, Malcolm BW, Rumble U, Macmichael D, aemeiits ND. The biological effect ofcontinous passive motion on the healing of full-thickness defects in articular cartilage: anexperimental investigation in the rabbit. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1980;62-A:1232-5l.
17-Stewart HD, Innes AR, Burke FD. Functional cast-bracing for Colles’ fractures : a comparison between cast-bracing and conventional plaster casts. J Bone Joint Surg (Br] l984;66-B :749-53.
18-Müller ME. The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones. In:Müller ME, Allgöwer M, Schneider R, Willenegger H, editors. Manual of internal fixation. 3rd ed. Heidelberg-New York: Springer-Verlag; 1991. p. 134-5.
19-Bilic R, Ruzic L, Zdravkovic V, Boljevic Z, Kovjanic J. Reliability of different methods of determination of radial shortening. Influence of ulnar and palmar tilt. J Hand Surg Br1995;20:97-101.
20-Cooney WP. Management of Colles’ fractures. J Hand Surg Br1989;14:137-9.
21-Altissimi M, Antenucci R, Fiacca C, Mancini GB. Long term results of conservative treatment of fractures of the distal radius. Clin Orthop 1986;(206):202-10.
22-Metz VM, Gilula LA. Imaging techniques for distal radius fractures and related injuries. Orthop Clin North Am 1993;24:217-28.
23-Mann FA, Wilson AJ, Gilula LA. Radiographic evaluation of the wrist: what does the hand surgeon want to know? Radiology 1992;184:15-24.
24-Taleisnik J, Watson HK. Midcarpal instability caused by malunited fractures of the distal radius. J Hand Surg [Am] 1984;9:350-7.
25-Scheck M. Long-term follow-up of treatment of comminuted fractures of the distal end of the radius by
transfixation with Kirschner wires and cast. Am J Orthop 1962;44-A:337-51.
26-Friberg S, LundströmB. Radiographic measurements on the radio-carpal joint in distal radial fractures. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1976;17:869-76.
27-Young BT, Rayan GM. Outcome following nonoperative treatment of displaced distal radius fractures in
low-demand patients older than 60 years. J Hand Surg Am2000;25:19-28.
28-Solgaard S. Function after distal radius fracture. Acta Orthop Scand 1988;59:39-42.
29- Boyd LG, Horne JG. The outcome of fractures of the distal radius in young adults. Injury 1988;19:97-100
30-Jenkins NH, Mintowt-Czyz WJ. Mal-union and disfunction in Colles’ fracture. J Hand Surg Br1988;13:291-3.

How to Cite this Article: Mahapatra N C, Maharaj R C, Khatua J, Nanda D P. | Outcome of Differential period of immobilization (4 weeks Vs 6 weeks ) of Colles’ Type Fractures of the Distal Radius in Geriatric population: A prospective study. | Odisha Journal of Orthopaedics and Trauma | January 2020; 01: 11-16 . https://doi.org/10.13107/ojot.2020.v41i01.005

(Abstract Text HTML)      (Download PDF)